Court To Decide Certificate Case Against Buhari Today

President Muhammadu Buhari


The Abuja Division of the Courtroom of Attraction is to ship judgment a go well with difficult the qualification of President Muhammadu Buhari to contest the 2019 Presidential Election, Channels Tv has revealed.


A 3-member panel of the courtroom presided over by Justice Atinuke Akomolafe-Wilson had on Monday reserved judgment within the go well with after listening to the argument canvassed by counsel to events within the matter.


The courtroom had held that the date for its judgment could be communicated to events.


However because the 60-day timeframe offered by the legislation for the listening to of the matter expires July 12, the courtroom communicated to events of its readiness to ship its judgment.


Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy El-Kuris had approached the appellate courtroom to nullify and put aside the judgment of the Abuja Division of the Federal Excessive Courtroom which declined to listen to their go well with instituted to problem the tutorial qualification of President Buhari earlier than the conduct of the 2019 Common Elections.


Among the many reliefs sought was a declaration that Buhari submitted false data relating to his qualification and certificates to the Unbiased Nationwide Electoral Fee (INEC), for the aim of contesting the election and thus, he ought to be disqualified.


In addition they prayed for an order of the courtroom directing INEC to take away the President’s title as a candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), and one other order restraining him from parading himself as a candidate within the presidential election, in addition to APC from recognising Buhari as a candidate.

ALSO READ:  Two Confirmed Dead, Other Missing In Lagos Boat Accident


On the final sitting, counsel to the appellant, Ukpai Ukairo, insisted that President Buhari was not educationally certified to have stood for the presidential ballot on the grounds that the required certificates weren’t connected to his type CF001, submitted to INEC for clearance to contest the presidential ballot.


He denied the declare that the go well with of the appellants was statute barred, including that the case was instituted on November 5, 2018, inside the 14 days allowed by legislation.


Ukairo stated the reason for motion began with the announcement and publication by INEC of profitable candidates for the 2019 Common Elections on October 25, 2018.


He, subsequently, urged the courtroom of attraction to permit the attraction and put aside the choice of the Federal Excessive Courtroom on grounds of miscarriage of justice.


The lawyer requested the courtroom to nullify Buhari’s participation within the February 23 Presidential Election as a result of he was not academic certified for the ballot on the time he did.


ALSO READ:  Shehu Sani speaks on death of two Nigerians in South Africa, twenty in Kaduna

Nevertheless, attorneys to the primary and second respondents, the President and the All Progressive Congress (APC), urged the courtroom to dismiss the attraction for being incompetent and missing advantage.


Counsel to the President, Mr Abdullahi Abubakar, particularly instructed the attraction courtroom that the case of the appellant was statute barred having not been filed inside the obligatory interval stipulated by the legislation.


He urged the courtroom to uphold the choice of the Federal Excessive Courtroom to the impact that the go well with was not filed in keeping with the place of the legislation.


Counsel to the APC, Mr Babatunde Ogala, aligned himself with the President’s submission and urged the courtroom to dismiss the attraction, whereas counsel to INEC, Onyeri Anthony, stated the fee was impartial and would abide by the choice of the courtroom.


The appellants, of their attraction, requested the courtroom to reverse the judgment of Justice Ahmed Mohammed on the grounds that the processes filed by President Buhari and used to strike out their go well with weren’t competent.


They claimed that the Federal Excessive Courtroom erred in legislation and in its resolution as a result of they didn’t problem the first election that produced the President because the candidate of the APC.

Supply hyperlink

Updated: July 12, 2019 — 1:35 pm